1 of 310 – a post-election view

I didn’t get the 500 votes I sought.  In fact, at just 310, I fell considerably short.  Mea culpa.  Many things went wrong, were done wrong, or were simply not done at all.  A passion for policy coupled with a passion for politics is not all it takes to run a campaign for elected office.  For one thing, you have to knock on more doors than I did, which is not something that comes naturally to me.  There’s an inherent fear that I am invading someone’s private life and so will be unwelcome when I knock.  Let’s face it – not everybody is happy when a politician knocks on their door.  And some of them are downright dismissive when that politician is wearing a Green Party pin.    I did knock on some doors, and had profoundly positive reactions at a few of them, besides.  But I didn’t knock on nearly enough.  I think you have to knock on all of them during a campaign.  Twice.

Also, you need more time than I had, both in terms of advance notice that you will even be running a campaign and in terms of having enough ‘free’ time during it.  I had neither of these.  The writ had been dropped nearly a week before I was approached about being a candidate.  Another day passed while I thought about the time commitment and whether I could balance that with my stay-at-home-dadness.  Clearly, since I ran, I decided I could.  But that was before I understood what sort of a time commitment an actual campaign would entail.  I simply didn’t have the time to do it properly.  A month or two notice, and a plan could (and would) have been pretty firmly in place, with a small slate of volunteers to cover everything from canvassing to babysitting.  Ah, but for the curse of time.

I believe I could have obtained the 500 votes I sought – which was roughly 5% of the popular vote – if I had concentrated all of my efforts and all of my free time in my riding, and I am responsible for not having done so.  I could have engaged more directly with the other candidates, could have visited more community events, could (and should) have knocked on more doors.  I could have done all of these things, but the party under whose banner I ran must share some culpability.

Province wide, The Green Party held steady in terms of popular vote.  In 2006, the party participated in its first province wide election and took 2.33% of the vote.   In 2009, in its second provincial election, the Greens took 2.33% of the vote.  Deja vu all over again.  So why the three year steady climb to end in the same place?

For one, there was no steady climb for the Green Party.  In the three years between elections, I can think of no meaningful attempts by the Green Party to insert itself into the political dialogue of Nova Scotia nor into the political consciousnesses of Nova Scotian citizens.  In the months leading up to the drop of the election writ, which only the most politically disinterested or uniformed could have failed to see coming, there appears to have been no concerted effort from the party to line up viable, interested, and interesting candidates.  And then, once the candidates were lined up, there was no candidate training, little advice or support from the central party leadership, and no central plan for a cohesive campaign.  We had 52 mini-campaigns instead, one for each riding, run with widely varying degrees of devotion.  Every party had some parachute or paper candidates, meaning people who were little more than names on the ballot so that the parties might be represented in all of the ridings, but the Green Party had more than the others.  In this dubious field, at least, the Greens were number one.

It was no way to run an election, and without a lot of growing up, the party would have no way to run the province.  Which was, after all, the job we were technically applying for.  I think I’d like to help the party grow up.  It needs specific (and costed) policies, and riding associations.  It needs clearer communication from the leadership and executive through the party ranks.  It needs to form a shadow government, to follow the workings of our new legislature.  It needs to applaud our new NDP government for the things it does right and offer constructive advice and insight on how that government might do things better.  It needs to get out in the community, and make its presence felt.

So many people I talked to over the course of this past campaign thought the Green party was the Marijuana Party.  And many more others believed it was a single issue, environmental party.  That’s a branding problem, and the perception of the Green brand in Nova Scotia will be one of the greatest hurdles for the party to overcome.  Especially if it doesn’t even try to.

Lest I should convey the wrong impression, I do believe in the Green Party, and I do believe it can have an important role to play in the future of the Nova Scotian political discourse.  We lost a lot of votes to the NDP this time around, simply because it was a great orange wave – or Orange Crush, as the Herald headline put it on June 10 – and Nova Scotians en masse seemed determined to put Mr. Dexter in the Premier’s office with a huge majority behind him.  A pre-election Angus-Reid poll showed that the Greens lost as much as 50% of their support to the NDP in the 2009 election.  Given that, it may be remarkable that the party even held steady at 2.33% of the vote.  We must have picked up a good number of votes from PC supporters to have done so.

Personally, I enjoyed seeing and working an election from the candidate side of things for a change.  It gave me a deep appreciation for the difficulties of the task.  And while I had enormous criticism to heap on the central party campaigns, comprised as they were of attack ads, meaningless soundbites, and politics-as-usual promises made, the candidates running in my own riding were all intelligent, decent and respectable people.  Colin Hebb, the young man running under the Liberal banner in my riding, particularly impressed me – and I would like have voted for him had I not had such an excellent Green candidate to support.  George Jordan, the candidate for the PCs, gave me the impression that he honestly cared about the riding and the province, and I respect him for that and for his involvement.  Plus he has an awesome voice.  Marilyn More, the NDP incumbent who again won handily this time, will continue to do a good job of representing her constituents, but this time with a view of Province House from the government side of things.  And good for her.  I wish her all the best, because she is my representative in government now, so her best is my best.

I am not done with politics in Nova Scotia, nor am I done with policy.  When the Legislative Assembly reconvenes, I and some of my fellow Greens will be there.  We will not sit in the House itself, because Nova Scotians have not given us that right.  But we will be in the visitor’s galley, watching the business of the house, taking notes and making plans.  We will criticize where criticism is called for and praise where it is warranted.  We will bring our ideas to the government in power, with the reminder that good ideas are good ideas and in matters of good governance and smart public policy, the origin of those ideas is irrelevant.  Good ideas can, and should, be stolen.  I encourage Mr. Dexter to hear the advice that all other parties have to offer.  I encourage him to hear the good ideas all Nova Scotians have to offer.

I believe Darrell Dexter has the potential to be a powerful proponent for positive social change in our province, and that all Nova Scotians should do what they can to encouragingly nudge him in that direction.  In the meantime, the Green Party has some remodelling and some cleaning to do in its own house.  Not until it has gone some considerable distance in that direction can it reasonably ask Nova Scotians to support it at the polls.

8 Responses to this post.

  1. Posted by AJ on June 12, 2009 at 12:01 pm

    One thing I found very odd about the Green campaign was how invisible it was – the Herald reported the party spent only $30,000, depite having received tax dollars per vote and for being a registered party. Reading the legislation, the “Green Party bonus” ($0.90 per vote + $125,000 per year) should have allowed every voter in the province to receive one piece of mail printed with FSC certified paper with 100% recycled paper. Instead, as you’ve pointed out, I received 0 knocks on my door, 0 calls, 0 emails, and 0 brochures. Even the website is weak.

    Where did the money go? If you want to look into remodelling and cleaning, look into the finances and see where that money’s going. Something seems wrong there. Ask them to open their books.

    Reply

  2. Posted by David Croft on June 12, 2009 at 1:25 pm

    It’s a fair question, AJ, and one that is on my mind as well. I believe thoroughly in financial transparency in politics, particularly when political parties are publicly funded as they are in Nova Scotia. Having the party open its books for all to see is an excellent suggestion, and one that will be brought to the party executive and leadership. Speaking for my own campaign, the only resources I received from the party itself were the candidate registration fee, some signs and some brochures. I did not mail out any brochures, as I did not have funding to do so, although I did leave a number of them at houses around my riding.

    When the questions regarding party finances are answered, I will address it in my blog again. For the record, I am not suggesting that because the transparency is missing that something is therefore suspicious, it could be a product of the internal disorganization of the party. Either way, it unquestionably needs to be remedied.

    Reply

  3. Posted by AJ on June 12, 2009 at 6:05 pm

    It’s not the lack of transparency that makes me suspicious – it’s the fact that the Herald reported the GP spent only $30,000. If the rest of the taxpayer money sitting unused in a GP bank account somewhere, that’s one thing, (they had a green vision but didn’t have a campaign vision, so they sat on it this election) but what happens if the party executive submits their financial report and it shows that there’s next to nothing in the bank, and only $30,000 spent – then I think you have to clean house.

    Reply

  4. Posted by David Croft on June 12, 2009 at 6:16 pm

    I am as interested as you are – doubly so perhaps, for while you have direct interest as a taxpayer, I have direct interest both as a taxpayer and as a party member – in seeing a detailed accounting of Green Party finances. There are expenses for a political party other than those that are incurred running an election, though. I am not insistent that every penny that has been spent thus far was spent on the election, but I am insistent upon seeing how every penny spent thus far was spent.

    I am certainly reserving judgment until the party executive *does* release its financial report. Any speculation beforehand is just that – speculation.

    Reply

  5. Posted by JP on June 17, 2009 at 11:57 am

    Hello David,

    I agree with you that the Green Party of Nova Scotia needs to brand itself better. This is still the beginning of the party in our Province and it will take time to get the message out.

    One of the top 3 problems in any organization is communication. It seems that this is at the top when it comes to the Greens of NS. Besides the Green leader not being included in the debates; the media was very kind and did talk a lot about the Green party (especially CBC). I am dumbfounded at the lack of a Province wide communication strategy. Be it incompetence or lack of experience this has to be addressed if the Greens are to get any serious vote percentages.

    With a majority government now in power, the Greens have a good idea of the time line leading into our next election. In four years the Greens can and should position themselves to NovaScotians in a manner that dispels many of the misconceptions that you talk about. A truly Province wide election plan, communicated to the electorate would do wonders.

    This is a very difficult task at hand. Many of us (NovaScotians) are stuck in our ways and views, especially when it comes to politics.

    However, I can see the change happening nationally. It’s picking up speed with your federal counterparts under Ms May. They are going ahead with more steam in the engines than ever before. Hopefully the NS Greens can do the same. Do not miss the boat!

    All this being said, David Thank you for running in our district. I am glad that I could vote my conscience.

    Cheers,

    JP

    Reply

  6. Posted by AJ on June 19, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    Just out of curiosity, I’ve seen people mention 4 Years a lot. Conservative supporters were calling for “4 More Years” for Rodney and now people (like JP above) are talking about getting ready in 4 years. Don’t majority governments in Canada last a maximum of 5 years, and the 4 year thing is an American quality? Or did civics class lead me astray?

    Reply

  7. Posted by David Croft on June 19, 2009 at 1:21 pm

    Your civics class was right on the money. Nova Scotian governments can last for as long as five years, but this is extremely rare. The calling of an election during a majority government is (almost) completely at the discretion of the Premier of the province, so long as the five year mandate is not exceeded. Typically, majority governments last about four years before a new writ is dropped. Typically, again, this is done when the premier feels his party is doing well in the polls and is likely to beat out the opposition. This is why sometimes elections are called even before 4 years have passed.

    For the record, I would like to do away with this hugely influential discretionary power of the Premier and have the province implement fixed election dates (such as they have in the US), so that how a party is doing in public opinion polling has nothing whatsoever to do with when we actually hold elections.

    Reply

  8. Great post David.

    I just found your blog this morning and it’s a great read. It’s great to find more Greens that realize that campaigning wins elections and campaigns take time and planning to be successful.

    Mark
    ReportonGreens.blogspot.com

    Reply

Respond to this post